Social media platforms challenge Chicago tax; Pritzker confident in statewide plan
(The Center Square) – Chicago faces an ongoing lawsuit over a tax ordinance on social media platforms that was imposed four months ago, but city officials said this week they have confidence in its legality.
The measure has also already brought in revenue far beyond expectations.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and the city council have both discussed the above-expected revenues generated by the City’s Social Media Amusement and Responsibility Tax this week.
Johnson announced Tuesday the tax is now projected to bring in $49.2 million, rather than the previous $31 million expected to be brought in during 2026.
“By making sure that we pass innovative progressive revenue streams, like the first of its kind Social Media Amusement Responsibility Tax or the smart tax. We can fund critical services like our mental health clinics and our crisis response teams,” Johnson said.
The tax is imposed, according to statute, on social media platforms with more than 100,000 users, at a rate of 50 cents per user after the minimum threshold.
The millions of dollars in revenue has yet to be counted toward the city’s budget however. The stated reason is because the measure is being challenged in court, according to city officials.
Deputy Corporation Counsel with the Chicago Department of Law Susan Jordan said the lawsuit is in an early stage.
“Nothing has happened thus far and we are defending it,” Jordan said.
Jung Yoon, policy chief for the mayor, added that the mayor’s office isn’t too worried about the merits of the case.
“We did look in the research phase drafting this to be very mindful of those limitations and we do believe we have strong defensible arguments,” Yoon said.
A similar policy that passed through the Illinois General Assembly in May seeks to tax the platforms statewide.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker defended the measure’s inclusion toward the projected tax base in the coming year’s budget to members of the media Tuesday.
“I have been, over the many years, not counting revenue that we don’t know that we’re going to get,” Pritzker said. “We in fact didn’t include things like the digital ad tax and things like that because we’re a little unsure about what could result from there.”
NetChoice, a trade group representing industry giants like Meta and X, filed a lawsuit against Chicago in March on the grounds that the city isn’t allowed to place an amusement tax on the companies.
A representative with the group told The Center Square that the group may also sue the state over other legislation, which has to do with the safety of children online.
Latest News Stories
Board Splits Along Party Lines to Approve 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda
Turmoil in Texas: Concerns for Paxton to drop out, Gonzales drops reelection bid
HHS and DOC announce nutrition education initiative for medical schools
Target sued for checking arrest records of new hires: Class action
Farm bill, with changes, heads to U.S. House for vote
Agency improves license processing times; PA leader calls for modernization
These are the members of Congress who voted against disclosing sexual harassment claims
House Republicans re-pass DHS funding bill in symbolic vote
Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker to Noem: ‘Don’t let the door hit you’
Trump’s newest tariff program won’t raise nearly as much money
Legal experts: Supreme Court should decide energy policy framework over climate lawsuits
Judge orders tariff refunds, but Friday’s hearing could set course