Pritzker: ‘We’re not raising people’s taxes’ for stadium
(The Center Square) – Gov. J.B. Pritzker says there could be a special legislative session in Illinois this summer, but he won’t raise people’s taxes to pay for a new Chicago Bears stadium.
Pritzker spoke in Chicago on Tuesday afternoon and said there could be a special session if the General Assembly can get together on one piece of Bears legislation.
“The first priority for me is we’re not raising people’s taxes to pay for a privately owned stadium, that’s number one, or any stadium for a billionaire-owned family,” Pritzker said.
The governor also said the legislature would be meeting again in few months. Fall veto session is scheduled Nov. 17-19 and Dec. 1-3.
After stadium and megaprojects bills stalled in the General Assembly, the Bears said last Friday that the team’s board of directors voted to advance a stadium project in Hammond, Indiana, with the exact site “to be selected.”
Pritzker said the Bears didn’t show up for the end of Illinois’ legislative session.
“From the beginning, of course, there were some fumbles that occurred by the Bears, beginning with a press conference with the mayor of Chicago talking about a multi-billion-dollar stadium that they wanted to have built with taxpayer dollars. That’s not something I was ever willing to do,” Pritzker said.
The governor also called out the Bears for talking to Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson after team officials issued a statement saying they were focused on Arlington Heights.
“And then late April, it turns out they’re talking to the mayor of the city of Chicago. So, look, I think all of that has to be worked out by the Bears,” Pritzker said.
Pritzker said people in Indiana would pay higher sales taxes and tolls if the Bears move there, and he didn’t think the people of Illinois would want that.
State Rep. Dan Ugaste, R-Geneva, plans to file a bill by early next week that would prevent local taxing bodies from getting stadium development money from taxpayers.
Ugaste said his proposal would also benefit the Bears.
“I’ve listened to their public comments, what they say they need. That’s what I’m trying to provide, as well as protecting the local taxpayers in the area and provide property tax relief for everyone throughout the state,” Ugaste said.
State Rep. Martin McLaughlin, R-Barrington Hills, is also planning to introduce legislation aimed at keeping the Bears in Illinois.
McLaughlin’s Taxpayer and Investment Protection Act applies to private developments with more than $2.5 billion in investments in counties with more than 1 million people.
According to McLaughlin’s website, the proposal provides long-term property tax certainty for investors, new revenue from surrounding businesses, infrastructure improvements, and year-round economic activity and jobs.
Taxpayer protections would come in the form of mandatory independent fiscal neutrality certification, negotiated property tax with 2.5% annual growth, infrastructure support with guardrails and a requirement that infrastructure support be repaid if the developer breaks a mandated 30-year commitment.
Latest News Stories
NIH plots investments in women’s health
Pritzker: ‘God was looking out for people’ in storm-damaged Kankakee County
Illinois Quick Hits: Correctional officer charged with sexual misconduct
24 AGs question funding of orgs refusing to remove climate agenda from judges manuals
Costco faces lawsuit as consumers seek refunds from invalid tariffs
Insurer won’t back Gori defense vs asbestos lawsuit fraud claims
With teachers union support, committee approves charter school mandates
Allstate can’t delete class action over alleged secret app tracking
Chicago voters view housing affordability as bigger issue than crime
New Illinois gun bill aims at glock switches; critics say it misses the real problem
Illinois quick hits: Cook County spends nearly $20 million on food, housing services; Chicago Teachers Union tells teachers, students to skip school; Russell Dickerson to play Du Quoin State Fair
Will County Officials Warn of Zoom Court Scam Targeting Defendants for Fraudulent Dismissal Fees