BREAKING: Minnesota sues feds for evidence in Metro Surge shootings
Minnesota filed a lawsuit Tuesday against the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for refusing to share evidence regarding three shootings involving federal agents.
Those shootings include the incidents involving Alex Pretti and Renee Good, which led to both of their deaths in January. It also references the shooting of Julio SosaCelis.
“The State of Minnesota has the authority and responsibility to protect against and address violence within its borders, including by prosecuting homicides, attempted homicides, and assaults,” the lawsuit stated.
It called the alleged lack of cooperation from the federal government “unprecedented noncooperation.”
DHS did not respond to a request to comment from The Center Square.
At the beginning of the year, DHS sent thousands of federal agents to the Twin Cities in an effort called Operation Metro Surge. More than 4,000 illegal immigrants have been arrested since it began.
Since federal agents were sent to the state, the Twin Cities faced nearly-constant public protests. The protests were heightened by the January deaths of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, both of whom were shot by federal agents in January.
The federal government began pulling back from the operation in February. Since the operation has come to an end, the City of Minneapolis has sought financial aid from the federal government to address the “damage” and “ongoing needs” it says were caused by the operation.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty, and Superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Drew Evans are leading the lawsuit. In addition to the DOJ and DHS, it also names U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Secretary of the U.S. DHS Kristi Noem.
The lawsuit is asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to force the federal government to share the evidence it has collected in reference to the three shootings.
“Cooperation is not merely customary. It reflects the basic structure of American federalism, under which the States retain primary authority to investigate and enforce violations of their own criminal laws,” the lawsuit said. “At stake is not only Plaintiffs’ access to evidence central to these shootings but also a fundamental principle of our constitutional system: that the States retain the sovereign authority—and responsibility—to investigate crimes committed within their borders.”
Latest News Stories
U.S. cut 92,000 jobs in ‘dismal’ February report, unemployment 4.4%
Board Splits Along Party Lines to Approve 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda
Turmoil in Texas: Concerns for Paxton to drop out, Gonzales drops reelection bid
HHS and DOC announce nutrition education initiative for medical schools
Target sued for checking arrest records of new hires: Class action
Farm bill, with changes, heads to U.S. House for vote
Agency improves license processing times; PA leader calls for modernization
These are the members of Congress who voted against disclosing sexual harassment claims
House Republicans re-pass DHS funding bill in symbolic vote
Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker to Noem: ‘Don’t let the door hit you’
Trump’s newest tariff program won’t raise nearly as much money
Legal experts: Supreme Court should decide energy policy framework over climate lawsuits