Will County Board Graphic.04

Will County Board Advised on Strict “Judicial” Role Ahead of Landfill Expansion Application

Spread the love

Will County Landfill Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026

Article Summary: During a detailed legal briefing on Tuesday, the Will County Landfill Committee received strict instructions regarding their conduct during the upcoming application process for a landfill expansion. Special Assistant State’s Attorney Charles Helsten warned officials that they must act as impartial judges and avoid private communications with the public or county staff to preserve the legal integrity of the siting process.

Landfill Siting Process Key Points:

  • Quasi-Judicial Role: Board members act as judges, not legislators, and cannot discuss the application privately (ex parte) once filed.

  • The “Ethical Wall”: A legal separation will be established between the County Board (the decision-makers) and the County Executive/Staff (the applicants).

  • Timeline: Once the application is filed, a public hearing must occur between 90 and 120 days later, with a final vote required within 180 days.

  • New Accessibility Laws: Recent state statute amendments require the county to provide interpretation services for non-English speakers and accommodations for disabilities to ensure “meaningful access.”

The Will County Landfill Committee on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, received a stern legal briefing regarding their responsibilities during the anticipated expansion of the county-owned Prairie View Landfill.

Charles Helsten, a Special Assistant to the Will County State’s Attorney, outlined the rigorous “quasi-judicial” process board members must adhere to, warning that the County Board will simultaneously serve as the applicant seeking the expansion and the judge approving it. To manage this conflict, Helsten described the implementation of an “ethical wall” to separate decision-makers from the county staff preparing the technical application.

“The author of a play or a novel cannot be the reviewing critic,” Helsten told the committee. “We will have one attorney that will represent the county in its executive capacity… There will be a separate attorney that represents you as the decision makers. And never the twain will meet.”

The briefing comes as the county prepares to file a siting application, a process governed by nine specific statutory criteria ranging from flood plain location to traffic impact and consistency with the county’s solid waste management plan.

Helsten emphasized that once the application is formally filed, board members are strictly prohibited from having “ex parte” communications—private discussions with the public or objectors regarding the proposal. He cited case law where election pamphlets promising a specific vote on a landfill were used as evidence of prejudgment, potentially jeopardizing the legality of the final decision.

“You sit as a judge,” Helsten said. “If you see Miss Williams and her attorney halfway through the trial going to lunch with the judge and then you lose, what are you going to think?”

The committee also reviewed the strict timeline mandated by state law. Once the application is filed, a 90-day review period begins. A public hearing must be held no sooner than 90 days and no later than 120 days after filing. The board must vote on the application within 180 days, or the project is deemed approved by default.

Helsten highlighted a new amendment to the state siting statute requiring “meaningful access” for the public. This includes mandatory interpreters for non-English speakers and accommodations for individuals with disabilities. Helsten noted this change was driven by a recent case in a Chicago suburb where a hearing was conducted entirely in English despite the local population being nearly 60% Latino.

“You bend over backwards to make sure that the process is fundamentally fair,” Helsten advised.

Board Member Kelly Hickey (D-Naperville) asked for clarification on how board members should respond to constituents asking about their voting intentions.

“At no point during the process should anyone say ‘this is how I intend to vote,'” Hickey asked.

Helsten confirmed that members should state they are keeping an open mind until all evidence is presented at the public hearing.

County Board Speaker Joe VanDuyne (D-Wilmington) noted that the board’s composition could change following elections and requested that the legal briefing be repeated for future members to ensure the process remains legally sound.

“We do want to do this correct,” VanDuyne said.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

U.S. cut 92,000 jobs in 'dismal' February report, unemployment 4.4%

U.S. cut 92,000 jobs in ‘dismal’ February report, unemployment 4.4%

By Andrew RiceThe Center Square The U.S. economy lost 92,000 jobs in February, a significant cut after January saw a better-than-expected report, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The...
Will County Board Federal Agenda

Board Splits Along Party Lines to Approve 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board adopted its 2026 Federal Legislative Agenda in a 10-9 vote, establishing the county's priorities for lobbying efforts...
Turmoil in Texas: Concerns for Paxton to drop out, Gonzales drops reelection bid

Turmoil in Texas: Concerns for Paxton to drop out, Gonzales drops reelection bid

By Bethany BlankleyThe Center Square Within two days of the March primary election, two high-profile races are already in turmoil. Republican leaders are taking actions to keep the seats red,...
HHS and DOC announce nutrition education initiative for medical schools

HHS and DOC announce nutrition education initiative for medical schools

By Emily RodriguezThe Center Square Nutrition education for medical students will become more prominent in curriculum beginning this upcoming fall. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F....
Target sued for checking arrest records of new hires: Class action

Target sued for checking arrest records of new hires: Class action

By Jonathan Bilyk | Legal NewslineThe Center Square CHICAGO — Target has been hit by a new class action lawsuit accusing it of violating Illinois state law by conducting criminal...
Farm bill, with changes, heads to U.S. House for vote

Farm bill, with changes, heads to U.S. House for vote

By Thérèse BoudreauxThe Center Square After more than 22 hours of debate, the Agriculture Committee in the House of Representatives voted early Thursday morning to advance the Farm, Food, and...
Agency improves license processing times; PA leader calls for modernization

Agency improves license processing times; PA leader calls for modernization

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation says it has reduced the average processing time for...
These are the members of Congress who voted against disclosing sexual harassment claims

These are the members of Congress who voted against disclosing sexual harassment claims

By Bethany BlankleyThe Center Square Nearly all members of Congress, 357 Republicans and Democrats, don’t want taxpayers to know which members have used taxpayer funds to pay sexual harassment claims....
House Republicans re-pass DHS funding bill in symbolic vote

House Republicans re-pass DHS funding bill in symbolic vote

By Thérèse BoudreauxThe Center Square The U.S. House re-passed the 2026 Homeland Security funding bill in a symbolic vote Thursday, amping up pressure on Democrats as DHS remains shuttered while...
Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker to Noem: 'Don't let the door hit you'

Illinois Quick Hits: Pritzker to Noem: ‘Don’t let the door hit you’

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker says former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s legacy is corruption and chaos. In...
Trump's newest tariff program won't raise nearly as much money

Trump’s newest tariff program won’t raise nearly as much money

By Brett RowlandThe Center Square President Donald Trump's newest tariffs, which already face a legal challenge in court, could increase deficits by $1.6 billion over the next decade, if they...
Legal experts: Supreme Court should decide energy policy framework over climate lawsuits

Legal experts: Supreme Court should decide energy policy framework over climate lawsuits

By Andrew RiceThe Center Square The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the fall over a case to decide whether states can sue fossil fuel companies for damages related...
Judge orders tariff refunds, but Friday's hearing could set course

Judge orders tariff refunds, but Friday’s hearing could set course

By Brett RowlandThe Center Square The government must refund more than $130 billion in tariffs imposed under President Donald Trump's unconstitutional tariff regime, even to those who did not file...
Iran War Powers resolution fails in House

Iran War Powers resolution fails in House

By Thérèse BoudreauxThe Center Square Congressional efforts to halt the U.S. military’s operations in Iran have now failed twice, with the U.S. House tanking a War Powers Resolution only a...
WATCH: Democratic officials sue Trump over new tariff

WATCH: Democratic officials sue Trump over new tariff

By Dave MasonThe Center Square Democratic attorneys general across the U.S. sued the Trump administration Thursday to stop the implementation of a new 15% global tariff under Section 122 of...