Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Newsom predicts smaller budget shortfall than state agency
Colorado ordered to pay $5.4M after abortion law blocked
Will County Health Department Reports Rise in Respiratory Illnesses, Updates on Facility Issues
Public Works Committee Delays Vote on State Police License Plate Cameras Amid Privacy Concerns
Four Republicans certified for primary to take on Pritzker
Illinois quick hits: State sues over frozen funds; Nicor Gas seeks rate hike
Treasury, IRS ramp up investigation into Minnesota fraud
Tariff authority decision still awaited from Supreme Court
Minneapolis schools offer remote learning while ICE operations continue
Trump administration sued for freezing child care funds
Minnesota authorities cut out of ICE shooting investigation
WATCH: SCOTUS considers gun ban; Pritzker responds to funding freeze; Bailey’s blueprint