Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Pritzker announces $2B in medical debt erased, half in Cook County
WATCH: Pritzker denies flying with Epstein
Illinois Quick Hits: Alleged Sinaloa boss indicted
Coroners warn bill renaming fentanyl overdoses could distort death certificates
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals for February 18, 2026
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Land Use & Development Committee for February 5, 2026
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Executive Committee for February 11, 2026
Group Presents Allegations of 2024 Voter Roll Errors to County Board
Will County Board Advised on Strict “Judicial” Role Ahead of Landfill Expansion Application
Land Use Committee Rejects Shorewood Solar Farm Despite 25-Year Lease Offer