Mike Tyson, Ric Flair accuse ex-CBD products partners of $50M+ fraud

Mike Tyson, Ric Flair accuse ex-CBD products partners of $50M+ fraud

Spread the love

Former heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson and WWE professional wrestler Ric Flair are leading a lawsuit they say is worth at least $50 million, claiming their supposed partners in licensing cannabis products instead made them victims of a racketeering and fraud scheme through which four men allegedly embezzled millions of dollars.

Tyson and Flair, through lawyers with the Chicago firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, filed their complaint Dec. 19 in federal court in Chicago, with two corporate entities as fellow plaintiffs: Miami-based hemp company LGNDS and CARMA HoldCo, which the complaint identifies as “a global branding company formed in Chicago that specializes in licensing celebrity brands” that sits at the heart of the lawsuit.

Named defendants include Chad Bronstein, who was CARMA’S board chairman and then president; CEO Adam Wilks; Nicole Cosby, who was a founding board member before going to work for CARMA as chief legal and licensing officer; and shareholder James Case, a longtime Bronstein associate.

“Throughout their time at CARMA, Bronstein and Wilks treated CARMA as their own personal piggy bank, using more than $1 million to pay for unauthorized personal travel on private jets, costs associated with Bronstein’s personal yacht, renovations to Bronstein’s personal residence, a mortgage payment for Wilks’ personal residence, and lavish entertainment expenditures for Wilks, including exorbitantly priced meals and travel expenditures, as well as excessive and unapproved compensation and bonuses,” the complaint alleged. “What’s more, Bronstein and Wilks entered into unauthorized agreements on CARMA’s behalf with third parties, which resulted in financial losses and liabilities to CARMA but lined the defendants’ pockets.”

Flair and Tyson said the defendants were repeatedly deceptive and fraudulent, naming as a fellow victim the musical artist known as Future. The lawsuit claims the celebrities signed licensing deals with CARMA, but alleged Bronstein and Cosby instead sold the rights to LGNDS and other unauthorized buyers. Tyson specifically said his CARMA contract granted him express approval over personal appearances, but alleged Wilks nonetheless inked contracts obligating Tyson to several events across the country.

“Bronstein, and later Wilks, demanded that the principal of LGNDS purchase Rolex watches worth at least $50,000 or else they would cancel LGNDS’ contracts with CARMA,” the complaint alleged. “On another occasion, Wilks received an identical Rolex watch worth in excess of $50,000 from the owner of an Amsterdam-based coffee shop which received a license to use Tyson’s likeness without having to pay CARMA’s customary $250,000 upfront licensing fee. Further, Bronstein and defendant James Case — a longtime associate and co-conspirator of Bronstein — demanded that LGNDS give Case a 10% ownership interest in LGNDS, free of charge, as a precondition for LGNDS’ licensing agreements with CARMA.”

The complaint further alleged Bronstein and Wilks had CARMA issue them hundreds of thousands of common shares, and said, although they knew the company to be worth $80 million, they told investors the value exceeded $120 million, then sold their shares for seven-figure profits.

“When certain individuals close to Bronstein began to take note of his conduct, he took measures to silence their criticism, including by using CARMA’s funds to fund paychecks so the critics could hold ‘ghost jobs’ at CARMA,” the complaint alleged. “These pseudo-jobs allowed Bronstein’s would-be critics to collect a paycheck from CARMA without the expectation that they perform any work.”

Tyson and Flair also alleged the same defendants are running similar schemes with Real American Beer, a product marketed around iconography of the late Hulk Hogan, and Real American Freestyle, a wrestling promotion that also had Hogan’s involvement and a broadcasting deal with FOX Nation.

The 76-page complaint include allegations about conduct as far back as Bronstein’s 2019 launch of the marketing technology company Fyllo, and his life sciences company Wesana Health, formed in 2020 with former pro hockey player Daniel Carcillo as a partner. It claims Tyson was a founding partner of CARMA and detailed the intellectual property licensing agreements for his name and likeness as well as the start of Bronstein’s relationship with Flair and the incorporation of Ric Flair Drip, which the retired pro wrestler “believed as a consolidation of his intellectual property for his benefit.”

Instead, according to the complaint, Bronstein and Wilks gave Flair only 47% of the shares in the company, while they each held 16%. Then, without telling CARMA’s board how much they owned, the men had CARMA buy 30% of Ric Flair Drip — Flair allegedly got no money from the deal — then had CARMA buy the remaining 70% interest in September 2022, not with cash, but an equity stake in CARMA.

“Bronstein and Wilks justified this self-dealing as simply right-sizing their ownership of CARMA, as they felt they deserved compensation above what was approved by the board of directors,” the complaint alleged.

CARMA’s executive team asked Bornstein to resign in November 2023, but the complaint alleged Wilks “followed Bronstein’s patterns of fraud and self-dealing” until the board removed him as well, with allegations about his improper roles in business relationships with companies like Green Success, a German distributor of cannabis products, and Mr. Charlie’s, a plant-based fast food company in Beverly Hills, among others.

In all the complaint brings 21 counts, including violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, conspiracy, money laundering, wire fraud, extortion, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and securities fraud. In addition to a jury trial, the plaintiffs seek at least $50 million, including treble damages, compensation for legal expenses and forced disgorgement of “all ill-gotten gains,” along with pre- and post-judgment interest.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Committee-Ad-Hoc.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee for February 10, 2026

Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee met on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, to continue its comprehensive...
Screenshot 2026-02-19 at 3.45.50 PM

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals for February 18, 2026

Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting | February 18, 2026 The Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals met on Wednesday, February 18, 2026, at 5130 W. Court...
Committee-Land Use.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Land Use & Development Committee for February 5, 2026

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | February 5, 2026 The Will County Land Use and Development Committee met on Thursday, February 5, 2026, to deliberate on several...
Committee-Executive.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Executive Committee for February 11, 2026

Will County Executive Committee Meeting | February 11, 2026 Meeting SummaryThe Will County Board Executive Committee met on Wednesday, February 11, 2026, tackling a heavy agenda focused on economic development...
Election Vote Graphic

Group Presents Allegations of 2024 Voter Roll Errors to County Board

Will County Board Meeting | February 19, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board approved a resolution calling for the review of election systems and integrity, following public comments alleging inaccuracies...
Will County Board Graphic.04

Will County Board Advised on Strict “Judicial” Role Ahead of Landfill Expansion Application

Will County Landfill Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Article Summary: During a detailed legal briefing on Tuesday, the Will County Landfill Committee received strict instructions regarding their conduct during...
Committee-Ad-Hoc.Graphic

Ad-Hoc Committee: Bath House Regulations Updated; Removes 60-Day Licensing Window

Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee approved updates to the regulations governing bath houses and...
Committee-Land Use.Graphic

Land Use Committee Rejects Shorewood Solar Farm Despite 25-Year Lease Offer

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | February 5, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Land Use and Development Committee voted against recommending a controversial solar farm proposal...
Screenshot 2026-02-19 at 3.45.50 PM

Voortman Steel Subdivision Moves Forward with Board Approval

Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting | February 18, 2026 Article Summary: A minor subdivision request for an industrial property on Ridgeland Avenue received a favorable recommendation from...
Committee-Executive.Graphic

Executive Committee Advances $28.7 Million BNSF Bridge Project for Lorenzo Road

Will County Executive Committee Meeting | February 11, 2026 Article Summary: The Executive Committee approved an agreement with BNSF Railway to construct a grade separation bridge on Lorenzo Road in...
Meeting-Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Crete-Monee School Board for February 17, 2026

Crete-Monee School Board Meeting | February 17, 2026 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Crete-Monee School District 201-U Board of Education met on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, to handle a variety of personnel,...
Committee-Land Use.Graphic

Land Use Committee: ‘Clean Fill’ Proposal Stalls After Unauthorized Tree Removal Sparks Environmental Concerns

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | February 5, 2026 Article Summary: A request to rezone land for a "clean fill" operation in Joliet Township stalled in committee...
Screenshot 2026-02-19 at 3.45.50 PM

Monee Planning Commission Backs Special Use Permit for Chestnut Road Rental

Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting | February 18, 2026 Article Summary: The Monee Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to recommend a special use permit...
Committee-Planning & Zoning.Graphic

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for February 17, 2026

Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting | February 17, 2026 JOLIET, IL – The Will County Planning and Zoning Commission met on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, with Acting Chairman John...
Committee-Ad-Hoc.Graphic

Ad-Hoc Committee: Liquor Ordinance Stalls Over Drafting Errors; Debates License Cap Policy

Will County Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee Meeting | February 10, 2026 Article Summary: The Will County Board Ad-Hoc Ordinance Review Committee postponed a vote on the comprehensive update to the...