U.S. Supreme Court upholds Texas' new congressional maps

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Texas’ new congressional maps

Spread the love

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday handed Texas a win in a challenge to its new congressional redistricting maps, granting a stay of a lower court ruling blocking them from going into effect. The ruling allows Texas’ new congressional maps to remain in effect for the 2026 midterm election. The new maps could flip up to five seats currently held by Democrats to Republican, analysts say.

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court said Texas was likely to succeed on the merits of the case and the district court “committed at least two serious [legal] errors.” It also ignored Supreme Court warnings about redistricting lawsuits filed months before an election, the court said.

“This Court has repeatedly emphasized that lower federal courts should ordinarily not alter the election rules on the eve of an election.

“The District Court violated that rule here. The District Court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections,” the high court said.

The justices also chastised the two lower court judges who issued the opinion for “failing to apply correct legal standards set out in case law.”

The high court’s ruling was expected after the lone dissenting Circuit Judge Jerry Smith expressed outrage over the process, alleging the chief judge engaged in “judicial misbehavior” and “outrageous conduct,” The Center Square reported. The ruling was issued in the U.S. District Court Western District of Texas El Paso Division, whose two majority judges have issued other decisions the U.S. Supreme Court later vacated, Smith said, adding that their ruling this time was no different.

In this case, two El Paso judges ruled that a new redistricting law that had already been on the books for more than 75 days couldn’t be used and Texas had to use a 2021 law, which the 2025 law repealed.

Smith argued the ruling was flawed and a “federal court cannot reinstate a statute that the legislature has explicitly repealed and voided.” He also said the majority judges engaged in judicial activism and ignored extensive case law.

Gov. Greg Abbott made a similar argument and the Attorney General’s Office filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court requesting a stay of the lower court ruling. Last month, the Supreme Court granted the request.

After hearing arguments on the case, the Supreme Court sided with Texas and chastised the lower court. The two majority district court judges “failed to honor the presumption of legislative good faith by construing ambiguous direct and circumstantial evidence against the legislature” and “failed to draw a dispositive or near-dispositive adverse inference against respondents even though they did not produce a viable alternative map that met the State’s avowedly partisan goals,” the justices said.

The Supreme Court upheld the Nov. 18 stay Justice Samuel Alito issued, effectively killing any chance of an appeal.

Justices Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch issued a statement noting that the lower court based its findings on “a mistaken impression of applicable legal principles. … Neither the duration of the District Court’s hearing nor the length of its majority opinion provides an excuse for failing to apply the correct legal standards as set out clearly in our case law.”

Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a brief dissent, saying the ruling “disrespects the work of the District Court” and “disserves the millions of Texans whom the District Court found were assigned to their new districts based on their race.”

The district lines were redrawn according to demographic shifts and voting patterns where Hispanic-majority districts increasingly voted Republican, state lawmakers argued.

Abbott praised the ruling in a statement, saying, “”We won! Texas is officially – and legally – more red. The U.S. Supreme Court restored the redistricting maps passed by Texas that were based on constitutional principles and Supreme Court precedent. The new congressional districts better align our representation in Washington D.C. with the values of our state. This is a victory for Texas voters, for common sense, and for the U.S. Constitution.”

The new maps will go into effect, changing nearly every congressional district in Texas. Many incumbents are moved to new districts, opening up at least seven new seats in which at least five are expected to flip Republican, The Center Square reported.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Illinois quick hits: Senator's deferred prosecution deal approved; Indiana Senate votes against new maps

Illinois quick hits: Senator’s deferred prosecution deal approved; Indiana Senate votes against new maps

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square Senator's deferred prosecution deal approved U.S. District Court Judge Andrea Wood has approved a deferred prosecution agreement to resolve the bribery...
Suspect in Charlie Kirk assassination makes first in-person appearance in court

Suspect in Charlie Kirk assassination makes first in-person appearance in court

By Morgan SweeneyThe Center Square The Utah man charged with assassinating conservative activist Charlie Kirk appeared in person before a Utah court Thursday for the first time since his arrest....
Pro-life orgs call out FDA, Makary for not fulfilling promise to review abortion drug

Pro-life orgs call out FDA, Makary for not fulfilling promise to review abortion drug

By Tate MillerThe Center Square Pro-life groups are holding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and its commissioner Marty Makary accountable for leaving its promise to review the “dangerous” abortion...
Bill to extend enhanced Obamacare subsidies dies in Senate

Bill to extend enhanced Obamacare subsidies dies in Senate

By Thérèse BoudreauxThe Center Square As expected, lawmakers failed to pass either of the competing partisan health care bills in the Senate on Thursday. The result all but ensures that...
Judge: CHA lawyers must pay $59K for citing ChatGPT-created cases

Judge: CHA lawyers must pay $59K for citing ChatGPT-created cases

By Jonathan Bilyk | Legal NewslineThe Center Square Lawyers who defended the Chicago Housing Authority in a case that resulted in more than $32 million in judgments to two families...
Op-Ed: Your kids now belong to the Chicago Teachers Union

Op-Ed: Your kids now belong to the Chicago Teachers Union

By Mailee Smith | Illinois Policy InstituteThe Center Square Students who can’t read and secrecy from parents – that’s just part of the legacy of Stacy Davis Gates during her...
Illinois quick hits: Former police chief convicted of bribery; man sentenced for fraud

Illinois quick hits: Former police chief convicted of bribery; man sentenced for fraud

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square Former police chief convicted of bribery A federal jury has convicted a former Summit, Illinois police chief of bribery offenses for...

WATCH: Chicago mayor: ‘Wicked’ people want chaos; critics rip mayor

By Jim Talamonti | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – The mayor of Chicago has expressed his opposition to an alternative budget proposal from the city council....
WATCH: Chicago mayor warns of budget ‘chaos,’ end-of-life options bill on gov’s desk

WATCH: Chicago mayor warns of budget ‘chaos,’ end-of-life options bill on gov’s desk

By Greg Bishop | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – In today's edition of Illinois in Focus Daily, The Center Square Editor Greg Bishop provides highlights from...
Screenshot 2025-12-10 at 12.07.09 PM

District Receives $553,500 Bid for Monee Education Center

Article Summary: The Crete-Monee School District 201-U has received a qualifying bid for the purchase of the Monee Education Center. The Board of Education is expected to vote on a...
Judy Ogalla

Ogalla Blasts New State Solar Legislation

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | December 2025 Article Summary: During a discussion on zoning matters, Will County Board Member Judy Ogalla strongly criticized the passage of...
Will County Board Land Use Committee Graphic.4

Committee Postpones Vote on Brandon Road Fill Operation After Tree Clearing Allegations

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | December 2025 Article Summary: The Will County Land Use and Development Committee voted to postpone a decision on a proposed clean...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Planning and Zoning Commission for December 2, 2025

Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting | December 2, 2025 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Will County Planning and Zoning Commission met on December 2, 2025, to consider a variety of...
Metra

Metra Announces No Fare Hikes; Highlights Bridge Projects in Joliet and Mokena

Will County Committee of the Whole Meeting | December 2025 Article Summary: Metra officials presented a balanced 2026 budget to the Will County Board, confirming that riders will not see...
Rent collusion suit tossed vs manufactured home community operators

Rent collusion suit tossed vs manufactured home community operators

By Scott Holland | Legal NewslineThe Center Square A federal judge has dismissed, for now, a class action accusing some of the nation’s largest manufactured home community landlords of rent...