High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

High-speed rail project criticized again after $3.5B contract

Spread the love

After a $3.5 billion contract was awarded for track and electrical work on California’s high-speed rail, critics are calling the entire project problematic because of a lack of transparency.

It’s the latest criticism of a delayed project that is costing taxpayers more than $100 billion in additional costs.

The firm Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog won the contract approved at Tuesday’s High-Speed Rail Authority meeting. That firm won out over one other bidder, which was ruled out because that firm didn’t meet all the requirements set out by the state agency.

No one from Kiewit, Stacy Witbeck and Herzog responded to The Center Square’s request for comment on Friday.

According to a presentation from the meeting earlier this week, $118.1 million will pay for design, acquiring materials and doing pre-construction work, among other facets of the project. Roughly $260 million will pay for engineering work, laying track and construction – totaling about $378.9 million to start laying down tracks.

Other facets covered by the contract include an overhead contact system and traction power, train control and communications systems.

“The bottom line is, I think we should pull the plug on this whole thing,” state Sen. Tony Strickland, R-Huntington Beach, told The Center Square on Friday afternoon. “The fact is that they’re moving forward without a realistic plan. Even the inspector general said the plan, moving forward, is unrealistic.”

Strickland said he is concerned the high-speed rail doesn’t have the money on hand to follow through on construction and be built the way it was proposed almost 20 years ago.

“They have major cash flow issues and major funding issues,” Strickland said. “The fact that they’re willing to move forward and waste billions of dollars on a project that I believe will never be built as proposed for the people of California, I think, is irresponsible.”

Some board members had concerns this week about designating so much money to paying for various phases of the continued construction of high-speed rail, especially with the $3.5 billion going to just one company. However, High-Speed Rail Authority staff said during the meeting that walking away from working with a contractor was “not desirable.”

“We’re invested and our partners are invested in getting this project right,” Ed Fenn, chief of construction at the High-Speed Rail Authority, said during the meeting. “We have a lot of institutional knowledge as far as what costs and schedules should be, and we have experts to help us ensure that we have competitive pricing going forward.”

An official from The High-Speed Rail Authority said on Friday via email that while the 119-mile segment that runs through the Central Valley will be electrified and ready to test after work is complete, it will start operations at a later date.

“It will not be operational yet,” Micah Flores, public relations manager for the California High-Speed Rail Authority, told The Center Square. “Certification, train-set testing and other pre‑revenue activities still need to occur. This segment is part of the 171-mile operating line between Merced and Bakersfield, which is planned to begin passenger service in 2033.”

So far, the high-speed rail project is estimated to cost $126.2 billion, much more than the $9.95 billion bond that California voters approved in 2008, according to previous reporting by The Center Square. The complete high-speed rail was supposed to be finished in 2020.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board Executive Committee for November 13, 2025

Will County Board Executive Committee Meeting | November 13, 2025 The Will County Board’s Executive Committee met on Thursday, November 13, 2025, with its agenda dominated by a lengthy series...
Will County Board Land Use Committee Graphic.2

Committee Rejects Rezoning for Fencing Company in Joliet Township

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | November 6, 2025 Article Summary: Citing incompatibility with the surrounding residential neighborhood, the Will County Land Use and Development Committee unanimously denied...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Land Use & Development Committee for November 6, 2025

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | November 6, 2025 The Will County Land Use and Development Committee navigated a series of contentious zoning cases on Thursday, November...
Will County Board Land Use Committee Graphic.2

Will County Committee Approves Rezoning, Denies Landfill Permit for Former Joliet Beach Club Site

Will County Land Use & Development Committee Meeting | November 6, 2025 Article Summary: The Will County Land Use and Development Committee on Thursday narrowly approved rezoning the former Joliet Beach...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Finance Committee for November 2025

Will County Finance Committee Meeting | November 2025 The Will County Finance Committee reached an impasse over the 2025 tax levy during a heated meeting on Tuesday, prompting the postponement...
Will County Board Graphic.03

Unpermitted Log Cabin and Stage Prompt Rezoning in Beecher

Will County Board Meeting | November 2025 Article Summary: The Will County Board approved a zoning map amendment and variances for a property in Beecher to bring existing unpermitted structures...
Will County Board Graphic.02

Engineering Firm Hired for Gougar Road Bridge Replacement

Will County Board Meeting | November 2025 Article Summary: The Will County Board authorized a $301,000 contract for the design of a new bridge carrying Gougar Road over the Canadian...
Will County Logo Graphic

Speed Limits Lowered in Green Garden and Frankfort Neighborhoods

Will County Board Meeting | November 2025 Article Summary: The Will County Board adopted ordinances to establish new, lower speed limits in specific areas of Green Garden and Frankfort Townships....
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Peotone Public Library District for October 2025

Peotone Public Library District Meeting | October 21, 2025 The Peotone Public Library District Board of Trustees on October 21, 2025, took significant action to expand services and handle key...
peotone library graphic logo.1

Library Board Takes Key Step in 2025 Tax Levy Process

Peotone Public Library District Meeting | October 21, 2025 Article Summary: The Peotone Public Library District Board of Trustees has formally approved its Certificate of Revenues, a legally required step...
Will County P&Z Logo Planning Zoning.2

Committee Grants Lenox Solar Farm Project Six-Month Variance Extension

Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting | November 18, 2025 Article Summary:The Will County Planning and Zoning Commission has approved a 180-day extension for variances tied to a commercial...
Vance to visit Fort Campbell before Thanksgiving

Vance to visit Fort Campbell before Thanksgiving

By Brett RowlandThe Center Square Vice President J.D. Vance will visit Fort Campbell in Kentucky ahead of Thanksgiving to celebrate with Army service members. Vance, 41, and his family will...

WATCH: Trump calls Pritzker a ‘fat slob,’ Illinois governor blasts president

By Jim TalamontiThe Center Square President Donald Trump has revived his criticism of Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker over crime, and Pritzker has fired back by blasting Trump over Thanksgiving dinner...
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser won't seek reelection

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser won’t seek reelection

By Sarah Roderick-FitchThe Center Square Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser announced she will not be seeking reelection. The Democratic mayor has served as the second female mayor of the nation’s...
Illinois business group warns of 'backbreaking' progressive income tax

Illinois business group warns of ‘backbreaking’ progressive income tax

By Greg Bishop | The Center SquareThe Center Square (The Center Square) – Manufacturers say legislators at the Illinois State Capitol have done enough damage and a progressive tax would...